Avis n°2021-01 présenté au nom de la commission Budget et finances par Denis REMOND
29 janvier 2021
Contractualisation Etat-Région :
• Accord de relance entre l’Etat et la Région Île-de-France
• Orientations du futur CPER 2021-2027
• Avenants au CPER 2015-2020 et au CPIER 2015-2025
Certifié conforme
Le président
Eric BERGER
Le Conseil économique, social et environnemental régional…","date_publication":"2022-11-06","sommaire_annexes":null,"action_budgetaire":null,"date_presentation":"2021-01-29","corps_projet_delib":null,"corps_expose_rapport":null,"retrait_ordre_du_jour":null},{"type":"Avis du CESER","url1":"https://www.iledefrance.fr/actes/avis-ceser/AVIS2024-03.pdf","url2":null,"theme":["Finances et fonds européens"],"titre":"Avis du CESER n°AVIS 2024-03 Compte financier unique de la Région Île-de-France pour 2023","numero":"AVIS 2024-03","archive":false,"coll_nom":"Région Île-de-France","corps_pv":null,"url_acte":"https://data.iledefrance.fr/pages/publication-des-actes-fiche-detail/?q='AVIS2024-03'","mots_cles":null,"type_acte":"AVIS","coll_siret":"23750007900312","corps_voeu":null,"identifiant":"AVIS2024-03","type_seance":["CESER"],"texte_arrete":null,"corps_reponse":null,"date_controle":null,"date_decision":null,"corps_decision":null,"corps_question":null,"date_affichage":"2024-05-23","corps_visa_delib":"
Avis n° 2024-03 présenté au nom de la commission Budget et finances par Claire DADOU-WILLMANN 23 mai 2024 Compte financier unique de la Région Île-de-France pour 2023 Certifié conforme La présidente
Valérie MULLER
Le Conseil économique, social et environnemental régional d’Ile-de-France Vu : • La Constitution, notamment son article 72-2 ; • La loi organique n°2004-758 du 29 juillet 2004 prise en application de l’article 72-2 de la…","date_publication":"2024-05-23","sommaire_annexes":null,"action_budgetaire":null,"date_presentation":"2024-05-23","corps_projet_delib":null,"corps_expose_rapport":null,"retrait_ordre_du_jour":null},{"type":"Avis du CESER","url1":"https://www.iledefrance.fr/actes/avis-ceser/AVIS2025-11.pdf","url2":null,"theme":["Tourisme"],"titre":"Avis du CESER n°AVIS 2025-11","numero":"AVIS 2025-11","archive":false,"coll_nom":"Région Île-de-France","corps_pv":null,"url_acte":"https://data.iledefrance.fr/pages/publication-des-actes-fiche-detail/?q='AVIS2025-11'","mots_cles":null,"type_acte":"AVIS","coll_siret":"23750007900312","corps_voeu":null,"identifiant":"AVIS2025-11","type_seance":["CESER"],"texte_arrete":null,"corps_reponse":null,"date_controle":null,"date_decision":null,"corps_decision":null,"corps_question":null,"date_affichage":"2025-11-17","corps_visa_delib":"
AVIS N° 2025-11
En quoi le tourisme de proximité constitue-t-il une opportunité pour l’Île-de-France ?
Avis n° 2025-11 présenté au nom de la commission Tourisme par Véronique Bensaid-Cohen, rapporteure et Isabelle Deleu, présidente
Cet avis a été adopté : Suffrages exprimés : 149 Pour : 139 Contre : 9 Abstentions : 1 Ne prend pas part au vote : 0
La présidente Valérie MULLER
Avis n° 2020-13 présenté au nom de la commission Affaires européennes et action internationale par Bernard BRETON
15 octobre 2020
Evaluation de la stratégie de la Région Île-de-France pour la francophonie
Certifié conforme
Le président
Eric BERGER
Le Conseil économique, social et envi…","date_publication":"2022-12-06","sommaire_annexes":null,"action_budgetaire":null,"date_presentation":"2020-10-15","corps_projet_delib":null,"corps_expose_rapport":null,"retrait_ordre_du_jour":null},{"type":"Avis du CESER","url1":"https://www.iledefrance.fr/actes/avis-ceser/AVIS2025-05.pdf","url2":null,"theme":["Finances et fonds européens"],"titre":"Avis du CESER n°AVIS 2025-05","numero":"AVIS 2025-05","archive":false,"coll_nom":"Région Île-de-France","corps_pv":null,"url_acte":"https://data.iledefrance.fr/pages/publication-des-actes-fiche-detail/?q='AVIS2025-05'","mots_cles":null,"type_acte":"AVIS","coll_siret":"23750007900312","corps_voeu":null,"identifiant":"AVIS2025-05","type_seance":["CESER"],"texte_arrete":null,"corps_reponse":null,"date_controle":null,"date_decision":null,"corps_decision":null,"corps_question":null,"date_affichage":"2025-06-16","corps_visa_delib":"
Avis n°2025-05 présenté au nom de la commission Budget et finances Claire Dadou-Willmann, rapporteure permanente Jacques Borensztejn, président
16 juin 2025
Avis n°2025-05 sur le Budget supplémentaire 2025 de la Région Île-de-France
La présidente Valérie MULLER
CONSEIL ÉCONOMIQUE, SOCIAL ET ENVIRONNEMENTAL RÉGIONAL D’ ÎLE-DE-FRANCE
2, rue Simone Veil - 93400 Saint-Ouen-sur-Seine - Email : ceser@iledefrance.fr - www.ceser-iledefrance.fr<…","date_publication":"2025-06-24","sommaire_annexes":null,"action_budgetaire":null,"date_presentation":"2025-06-16","corps_projet_delib":null,"corps_expose_rapport":null,"retrait_ordre_du_jour":null}],"record_count":"90","data_size_bytes":null,"dataset_count":null,"query_examples":[{"url":"https://data.iledefrance.fr/api/explore/v2.1/catalog/datasets/avis-ceser/records?limit=20","curl":"curl -s 'https://data.iledefrance.fr/api/explore/v2.1/catalog/datasets/avis-ceser/records?limit=20' -H 'Accept: application/json'","label":"List records","method":"GET","description":"First 20 records of the dataset as JSON."},{"url":"https://data.iledefrance.fr/api/explore/v2.1/catalog/datasets/avis-ceser/records?select=coll_nom%2Ccoll_siret%2Cidentifiant&where=coll_nom+is+not+null&limit=20","curl":"curl -s 'https://data.iledefrance.fr/api/explore/v2.1/catalog/datasets/avis-ceser/records?select=coll_nom%2Ccoll_siret%2Cidentifiant&where=coll_nom+is+not+null&limit=20' -H 'Accept: application/json'","label":"Select & filter","method":"GET","description":"Project specific fields (coll_nom, coll_siret, identifiant) and filter with ODSQL where clauses."},{"url":"https://data.iledefrance.fr/api/explore/v2.1/catalog/datasets/avis-ceser/exports/csv","curl":"curl -sL 'https://data.iledefrance.fr/api/explore/v2.1/catalog/datasets/avis-ceser/exports/csv' -o dataset.csv","label":"Export CSV","method":"GET","description":"Full dataset export as CSV (also available: json, parquet, xlsx)."}],"status":"ok","error_message":null,"profiled_at":"2026-09-01T20:38:40.701Z","run_id":"f8927bae-6a3f-4ed3-8c69-d751204315b9","created_at":"2026-07-25T05:13:59.198Z","updated_at":"2026-09-01T20:38:40.701Z","license_raw":"https://www.etalab.gouv.fr/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/ETALAB-Licence-Ouverte-v2.0.pdf","license_id":"lo-2.0","consecutive_failure_count":0,"last_error_at":null,"last_error_message":null,"previewable":true,"personal_data":{"status":"none","basis":"no_person_column_cited","grain":"none","allowed":true,"columns":{"direct_identifiers":[],"family_names":[],"given_names":[],"attributes":[],"unresolved_names":[],"measures":[],"entity_identifiers":["coll_siret"]},"publication":null,"publication_evidence":null,"notice":"personal data: no cited column names a natural person (the cited columns are all this reads)"}},"datasets":[],"limits":[{"id":"b686a793-9d6b-42bc-af2c-72919910cbe8","entry_id":"be8d5d5d-41c3-49e8-ba7e-89751564284c","limit_type":"requests_per_day","value":"1500000","unit":"requests","period":"day","scope":"per-ip","source_id":null,"claim_type":"measured","confidence":"0.90","observed_at":"2026-09-01T20:38:41.716Z"}],"source_access":{"status":"accessed_despite_disallow","host":"data.iledefrance.fr","requested_path_prefix":"/api/explore/v2.1/","robots_url":"https://data.iledefrance.fr/robots.txt","user_agent_group":"*","robots_rule":"Disallow: /api/","robots_read_at":"2026-08-25T11:29:14.157Z","decision_ref":"owner decision 2026-08-22, recorded in docs/PROGRESS.md NEEDS-HUMAN: public-sector open-data portals whose purpose is machine access; the directive is an Opendatasoft vendor default reflecting no publisher intent. Concern raised and overruled; see the row.","note":"This answer is derived from a host whose robots.txt DISALLOWS the path Commodity requests, and Commodity requests it anyway under the decision named in `decision_ref`. The rule is quoted verbatim so you can read it yourself. Commodity does not send a user-agent it is not, so any `Allow` granted to a named crawler in that file is not claimed here."},"field_provenance_source_access":{"status":{"basis":"platform_computed","derived":true,"upstream_field":null,"transform":"THIS PLATFORM’S READING OF ITS OWN CONDUCT: that it requests a path this host forbids. No publisher asserts it and none was asked to","cells":{"rows":1,"delivered":1,"empty":0,"stringified":0,"truncated":0}},"host":{"basis":"platform_computed","derived":true,"upstream_field":null,"transform":"the host Commodity addressed, lowercased and stripped of scheme and port by this platform so that one host has one row and one reading","cells":{"rows":1,"delivered":1,"empty":0,"stringified":0,"truncated":0}},"requested_path_prefix":{"basis":"platform_computed","derived":true,"upstream_field":null,"transform":"THE PATH THE VERDICT IS ABOUT, derived from the base URLs this platform stores for the host — not `/`, and not an assumed `/api/`. A verdict about a path we do not call would describe someone else’s traffic","cells":{"rows":1,"delivered":1,"empty":0,"stringified":0,"truncated":0}},"robots_url":{"basis":"platform_computed","derived":true,"upstream_field":null,"transform":"where the file was fetched from — composed by this platform from the host, at the one location the protocol fixes, so it can be re-fetched and the reading disputed","cells":{"rows":1,"delivered":1,"empty":0,"stringified":0,"truncated":0}},"user_agent_group":{"basis":"stored_sample","derived":false,"upstream_field":"the `User-agent` line the deciding rule sits under","transform":"the group heading that made the rule OURS, verbatim from the stored file. Where it is `*` the directive addresses everyone; a group naming another crawler was not applied, because Commodity does not send a user-agent it is not","cells":{"rows":1,"delivered":1,"empty":0,"stringified":0,"truncated":0}},"robots_rule":{"basis":"stored_sample","derived":false,"upstream_field":"the directive line of the matching group","transform":"THE PUBLISHER’S OWN LINE, QUOTED AND UNCUT, as read from robots.txt at the moment below and stored — not fetched for this request, and not part of this response’s payload. It is here so the verdict beside it can be checked rather than taken from us","cells":{"rows":1,"delivered":1,"empty":0,"stringified":0,"truncated":0}},"robots_read_at":{"basis":"platform_computed","derived":true,"upstream_field":null,"transform":"OUR CLOCK when the file was read, never a `Date` header the origin sent. It bounds how stale this reading may be: a publisher can have changed the file since","cells":{"rows":1,"delivered":1,"empty":0,"stringified":0,"truncated":0}},"decision_ref":{"basis":"platform_computed","derived":true,"upstream_field":null,"transform":"WHO DECIDED TO CALL IT ANYWAY, AND WHEN. Recorded by this platform and required by the database before the exception may exist at all, so it can never be anonymous","cells":{"rows":1,"delivered":1,"empty":0,"stringified":0,"truncated":0}},"note":{"basis":"platform_computed","derived":true,"upstream_field":null,"transform":"this platform’s sentence explaining what the reader is holding. Written here, by us, and not a quotation of anybody","cells":{"rows":1,"delivered":1,"empty":0,"stringified":0,"truncated":0}}},"manifest":{"answer_sha256":"2ade684a520c925172071a4f926f53f9b9e2b04456aa818eed0b9ce334233690","answer_sha256_rule":"sha256 (hex, UTF-8) of JSON.stringify(this body) after deleting the keys listed in manifest.stamped_keys from manifest, and deleting manifest itself if it is then empty. The hash was computed before the stamp existed, so no field of the stamp is inside it.","stamped_keys":["answer_sha256","answer_sha256_rule","stamped_keys","row_count","row_count_basis","live","live_basis","created_at","created_at_basis","durable_citation"],"row_count":52,"row_count_basis":"Objects that are elements of a JSON array anywhere in this body, excluding manifest. Not a claim about which collection is the answer. Largest single collection: data_profile.fields[] (31 rows).","live":true,"live_basis":"This body was produced by executing the request.","created_at":"2026-09-08T09:57:57.269Z","created_at_basis":"When this response body was assembled, deliberately OUTSIDE the hashed bytes so the same answer hashes identically on every request. Not the upstream read time — that is provenance[].retrieved_at. A zone-cached replay carries the assembly time, not your receipt time.","durable_citation":"This manifest is produced at response time and is NOT stored. A durable, replayable citation is persisted only on an explicit cite: GET /api/v1/entries/{id-or-slug}/evidence, or the MCP cite_query tool. Both are entry-scoped, because evidence_manifests is entry-shaped; a domain answer spanning several sources has no single entry and cannot be persisted through that path."}}